The Anti-Free-Market Federal Reserve
I believe in democracy, freedom, capitalism, and a free market. Why does the Federal Reserve keep insisting that it knows better by implementing anti-capitalistic plans and perpetually fucking around with the market? Please let the market operate! Let it go! Prices are what they should be! That's the definition of a free market! When they manipulate the market it's no longer free.
This includes the proprietary trading systems at investment banks. If the bank can invest its own money, it can influence the market in any way it sees fit. Want to tell politicians that a particular law or not passing a particular law would cause the market to drop (or rise)? They can trigger it. This is called Terrorism, and it was used to pass the bank bailout bill in late 2008. Investment banks investing their own money is a conflict of interest to democracy, their own clients, and the interests of the economy.
@ 9:10
The FBI should be investigating that act of Terrorism by the banks and Federal Reserve System. Even if the people didn't know (and thus weren't afraid), the politicians were threatened directly to pass the bailout bill. Influencing law is exactly what terrorism is designed to do... at it seemed to work, unfortunately.
Official says Fed might buy more mortgage-backed securities
The Federal Reserve would consider reopening its program to support the mortgage market if interest rates spiked or the economy showed new weakness, Federal Reserve Bank of New York President William C. Dudley said in two new interviews.
The Fed is buying $1.25 trillion in mortgage-backed securities in its effort to prop up the economy but has said it will end those purchases March 31.
They need to stop manipulating the market immediately.
This manipulation introduces distortion in the market. That distortion is not singular. It ripples out through the economy. These ripples required more fixes and those even more until it's the Katrina Hurricane of the financial market.
In order to force the market to be focused on people, this bailout money would have been better placed into the hands of the people. At least the distortion would have been citizen oriented instead of banker bonus oriented. Then again, it's corporate America that gives politicians the money to convince us to vote for them; so it's not too surprising that this didn't happen.
In all, there should have been no bailouts. Failure for companies that are too weak. Success for those that could fill their place. Would there have been pain? Yes. But, that short term pain is much smaller than the long term pain we are now in for now.
Elizabeth Warren On The Daily Show: If We Don’t Act ‘The Game Really Is Over’
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Elizabeth Warren | ||||
|
||||
I've always liked Elizabeth Warren because she is right.
Just as I posted earlier, people are waking up to the fact that politics is theatre and that politicians do not represent us (at least most of them). It's angering but it's important to get a third party or more going in America.
My solution to making third parties real is laws stating that all elections are to be instant run-off. Instead of voting for one candidate, you prioritize them. If the one you chose first doesn't have enough votes your next in line is thus counted as your choice. So, you could have voted in the last Presidential Election like this
- Ron Paul
- Cynthia McKinney
- Ralph Nader
- Dennis Kucinich
- Barack Obama
How sweet would that be? If none of your other choices had a chance, you still could have helped to defend against McCain (or visa versa). You could actually vote based on your principles instead of the lesser of two evils. If course it must be said that our political party election system is more like voting for the one evil as they really are the same party with different faces. I ask you, what would McCain have done substantially different from Obama? And how is Obama any different than Bush?
9/11 Pentagon Attack Videos?
There have got to be tens if not hundreds of video tapes of the 9/11 Pentagon attack.
Why are they not releasing these tapes unless they have something to hide?
Given that it was so long ago, it's no longer really a national security issue... unless there was no plane that hit the Pentagon.
When you look at the building, there is no destruction where the engines of the plane would have hit the building.
I call for the US government to release ALL tapes without edits from the 9/11 Pentagon Attack.
How about these apples?
NAU Federal Reserve Notes – 2009 Series – Initial Release
I just came across these. The North American Union Federal Reserve Notes 2009 Series Initial Release:
These claim to be the "Initial Release - 2009 Series"
Given that the 2010 series hit the web first and had a LOT of flaws in them as far as currency goes, I'll have to say my initial impression is that these are the new and improved fakes.
The see through alignment of the denominations is much better but there are still some problems with the "semi-transparent" nature of these bills...
If you look at a real bill, even more so under intense light, you won't see anything showing through. It's clear from these bills that the creator wanted you to see through it to make it appear "real." Do the test yourself. Get a bill out of your wallet and put it on a table or counter. Do you see the reverse side showing through? How about even a little? What about under the beam of a flash light?
In this series they added the word "Dollar" to the bill to tell you what currency it actually is unlike the last version they released. The designs between the denominations have been standardized too. This is a major improvement in the believability of these bills.
There is a clear lack of continuity between the 2010 and 2009 series. This suggests to me that these are indeed fakes.
Another problem with these bills is the confusion of the designer over the the Note Number Position and the Federal Reserve District Number. These are the numbers associated with these bills:
One - L1
Two - JP Morgan - F6 (previously on the $200 bill for the supposed 2010 series)
Five - B2
Ten - L12
Twenty - A1
Fifty - E5
One Hundred - B2
The Note Number Position on the ten is not even close to possible on the Federal Reserve bill printing presses. Just see this webpage on what these are. If these are meant to be Federal Reserve District Numbers then each of these bills would be coming off their respective presses in San Francisco, Atlanta, New York, Boston, and Richmond. If this is the initial release, they wouldn't have printed them at different locations if they are just "specimens" as the text across each bill states. That's massively expensive to print them at all those locations for just a specimen. Another note worthy catch is that the One Dollar Bill is L1 which is an illegal combination of the District Number. It would be A1 or L12 not L1 unless it was a very large sheet of paper being printed and it was the Note Number Position.
Another thing, they took out the $200 bill and added the $2. JP Morgan is a highly esteemed member of the bankers club and would be placed much higher than the morbid and mostly unused $2 bill. This is just laziness on the part of the designer.
These are not high enough detail to analyze the security strip or the roman numerals on the pyramid. Also, a sheet of bills is not provided as it was the last time. I deemed those to be fake because the note number positions were all the same as were the "holograms." (If the A2 was the Federal Reserve District Number then it would have been illegal: B2 or A1 would be fine but not A2.) This may be a calculated aspect of these images. If you don't put them out in high res they can't be dissected very well for flaws like the ones found in the 2010 series.
My last piece of evidence is that these are 2009 series. There is about 35 days left in 2009. Are they really planning on getting the NAU going within this time period? Given that the 2010 series is so completely under-developed, I find it impossible to believe that 2009 is the year of the NAU.
So, the 2009 series are much better fakes. They are still fakes.
If you designed these fake pieces of trash and are reading this, you better keep your day job. These are awful.
It's worth noting, again, why put so much effort into this? Who are they trying to fool and why? Cointel pro maybe. Why indicate 2009 on these bills?
Another unanswered question is why use important people to the Federal Reserve? This may be designed to make people more angry at the Federal Reserve. I'm not having it. There are plenty of reasons to be angry with the Federal Reserve... this is not one of them.
You shouldn't take these seriously... just like Sarah Palin.
9/11 Truth – The Pentagon Attack
National Security Alert - Citizen Investigation Team
To whom it concerns, i.e., everyone:
In 2006 Citizen Investigation Team launched an independent investigation into the act of terrorism which took place at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. This exhaustive three-year inquest involved multiple trips to the scene of the crime in Arlington, Virginia, close scrutiny of all official and unofficial data related to the event, and, most importantly, first-person interviews with dozens of eyewitnesses, many of which were conducted and filmed in the exact locations from which they witnessed the plane that allegedly struck the building that day.Be forewarned: Our findings are extraordinarily shocking and frightening. They are also deadly serious, and deserving of your immediate attention. This is not about a conspiracy theory or any theory at all. This is about independent, verifiable evidence which unfortunately happens to conclusively establish as a historical fact that the violence which took place in Arlington that day was not the result of a surprise attack by suicide hijackers, but rather a false flag "black operation" involving a carefully planned and skillfully executed deception.
If you are skeptical of (or even incensed by) this statement we do not blame you. We are not asking you to take our word for it, nor do we want you to do that. We want you to view the evidence and see with your own eyes that this is the case. We want you to hear it directly from the eyewitnesses who were there, just as we did.
Please understand that this information is not being brought to your attention simply for educational purposes. It is presented within the context of a “call to action” accompanied by a detailed step-by-step strategy intended to inspire and empower you to do something about it. But first, please familiarize yourself with the evidence by viewing and paying close attention to the 81-minute video presentation, National Security Alert.
Thank you for your concern and thank you for your action.
Sincerely,
Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis
Citizen Investigation Team
NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT - SENSITIVE INFORMATION from Citizen Investigation Team on Vimeo.
Citizen Investigation Team offers this compilation of independent verifiable evidence exposing the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon as a psychological black operation of deception. Consider this a non-violent call to action as everyone is encouraged to copy and distribute this conclusive evidence to media, political, and authority figures while first requesting, and then demanding a response. Inaction by authorities and media to this information amounts to a crime of obstruction of justice so it's time they are held accountable. This is particularly the case as more innocents are slaughtered and additional billions of dollars are spent on a fraudulent "war on terror" perpetuated under any other name. Please visit CitizenInvestigationTeam.com for full resources and a step-by-step strategy as to how you can take action on this critical life or death information. Click on the below link to subscribe to receive email notifications of updates:
http://cli.gs/EPband
Make up your own mind.
When you look at the impact on the building ask yourself, where is the damage from the wings and engines?
The New Federal Reserve North American Union Bills – Fake with proof
Original: The North American Union Currency – 2010 Series
Great Commentary: NAU currency or another hoax?
If this is another Amero hoax (remember FBI-informant-white-supremacist Hal Turner’s Amero coin hoax) it is an elaborate one– possibly more FBI work. Even if it is, we have no reason to doubt a new NAU currency is planned.
Out of the gates, I see one questionable issue with the $200 bill. Why is the text so much crisper than the photo of J.P. Morgan?
The North American Union, for all practical purposes, has already been signed into law, thanks to the likes of NAFTA and the SPP agreement. The EU already has it’s own currency, the Euro. It’s hardly unreasonable to think we may someday have North American currency. But why would a FBI-run white supremacist like Hal Turner be so intersted in discrediting this using straw man hoaxes?
There are growing numbers of Americans who see the writing on the wall with respect to the dollar. A timely dollar devaluation would set the stage for an exchange rate favorable to the bankers issuing a new currency. But if the middle class gets out of dollars before it loses all it’s value, then we end up preserving our wealth and that is not at all what the banking elite have planned.
So regardless of whether this is real or not, I strongly urge everyone to get out of paper/fiat investments and into property, gold/silver, commodities, energy independence, guns, etc.- things with real value, not worthless inflatable paper.
The image:
FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE SPECIMENS
THE FINAL REVISION - 2010 SERIES - INITIAL PRINTING
(The front face on the left, the back with image on the right. 1, 5, 10, 20 50, 100, 200)
PRETRIAL SPECIMENS ONLY - NOT AUTHORIZED FOR CIRCULATION OR PUBLIC RELEASE
PNISHABLE UNDER THE USC TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 17, § 334
The text here says to me that these claim to be scans of actual bills off the printing press. How true is this? Let's find out!
Only one other country has a 200 unit note: Switzerland. To counter balance this, the only other $200 bill was fake and had G.W. Bush on it.
The One unit bill has UNO written on the back over the lower left numeral. No other denomination here has any Spanish text so prominent. That would be an important usability feature for transactions.
There is no currency specified. All these NAU bills say the denomination but not the currency. Euros even say 'EYPΩ' (The Greek spelling of 'EURO') in addition to 'EURO'. If it said Ameros on it or some other unnamed currency, then I'd believe it.
The image was "created" by Picasa 3.0. It's in the JPEG Header. I doubt anyone at the Federal Reserve Manages enough images to warrant a photo manager. Even then, they wouldn't use Picasa due to its social features and the security risks that poses with something so sensitive. You can basically click a button and share the image with the world. They wouldn't allow this. Not at all. Having worked at a large financial institution, unauthorized software is punishable by explicit and swift firing. There may have been an intermediary that used Picasa and it resaved the file with it's own heading, but it's very dubious.
The text around the illuminati symbol says: "Domus Aedificata est" and "Novus Ordo Mundi" which translates to "This house was built for me" and "New World Order," respectively. The Roman date below the illuminati pyramid is 1776 which has no NAU meaning. The influence of the Federal Reserve in these bills would make 1913 a much more important date to signify under the illuminati.
The current US bills have a marking on them to describe their location in the sheet. Here are samples of these bills where you can clearly see the location in the sheet at the bottom of each snapshot.
Here are the sheet position markings on these bills:
- 1 - L1
- 5 - A4
- 10 - A2
- 20 - A1
- 50 - A7
- 100 - G1
- 200 - F3
If these bills were printed they were pulled randomly out of each stack for the scan. There is a chance of this happening. The damning evidence is if these bills were produced from the same presses as our US Dollar Bills are printed now, there is no such position as L1 nor A7 unless the one unit and fifty unit paper is exactly twice the size. Together, the paper would be 4 times the normal size. In other words, to get a bill in position L7 the paper would be huge (as in, four times the normal size). This is not how bills are printed. These things are standardized for efficiency, quality, and cost.
The fact that there are bankers and important people to the Federal Reserve on the bills is utter non-sense. This would never happen. There is too much pent up anger at banks in North America (all over the world really) and no one would stand for it. Most people have no idea who these people are!
- 1 - Charles S. Hamlin - First Chairman of the Federal Reserve.
- 5 - Nelson Wilmarth Aldrich - Politician instrumental in setting up the Federal Reserve.
- 10 - William Gibbs McAdoo - U.S. Senator, United States Secretary of the Treasury and director of the United States Railroad Administration. Served as an "ex-officio member" on the first Federal Reserve Board.
- 20 - Edward Mandell House - Laid the groundwork for establishment of the Council on Foreign Relations.
- 50 - Paul Moritz WarburgHelp to found of the Federal Reserve System. He was appointed a member of the first Federal Reserve Board.
- 100 - John D. Rockefeller Advocated for the Federal Reserve (at least)
- 200 - John Pierpont Morgan The most powerful banker before the Federal Reserve System
There are a number of elements that "show through" the bills and when comparing them, some elements are missing. One side is much more transparent than the other. The most interesting evidence is that the partial numbers on the two sides of all the bills don't form a perfect number while the text "THE UNITED FEDERATION OF NORTH AMERICA" is exactly lined up with the background fade of the opposite text. This technique exactly lines up so you can read the denomination very clearly when holding a bill up to the light including in the Euro. A notable point is that the "faded see-through" of the number pieces an each side is a perfect denomination despite the fact that superimposing an aligned, flipped reverse side does not produce a perfect denomination. Each side suggests the see through nature and point out that it does line up but when you actually put it together these elements to not line up.
On the left is the Photoshop combined 50-50 faded overlay of the two sides, one side is horizontally flipped so it overlays as if you were to look through it with light on the other side. It's completely out of alignment. Yet, as you can see from the middle and right, each denomination on each side clearly ghosts through as the whole number.
This holds true for the denomination security strip in each bill as well. Superimposing lines on each side places this strip in very different places The one and five is almost there, but all the others are way off. This is the 100 bill. The strips have been highlighted in red and blue to show you how off they are. You can see the ghost of the strips without the color overlay.
For clarity you can look at this enhanced image too. This is darkened to show you the see through ghosting of the reverse side a bit better.
Lastly, the bill positions on the supposed sheet of tens are all A2. This is not how they would be labeled. If this was a pretrial print run, they'd most likely do the actual bill positions in the sheet so as to test that aspect of the printing system.
Given this analysis... I'm going to step out and say these bills are 100% fake. Clearly, the person or organization spent a lot of time trying to get it right but there are a lot of "mistakes" that an actual printed bill would not have. Any graphic designer worth their salt would have caught these mistakes. This leads me to believe they were purposefully placed there. People without the analysis ability would start speculating. People with the ability would scan the bills and say, yeah, maybe they're real. Anyone doing real analysis would find the mistakes. These flaws are so obvious that they almost WANT people to know it's fake.
This begs the question why go through this exercise? Who would do such a thing?
My best guess is that this is some kind of CoIntelPro. It's an attempt to discredit the conspiracy theorists. Police use these techniques all the time. They infiltrate a group of peaceful protestors and cause violence and havoc which allows the riot police to move in with the fake reason of crowd control. But what is the purpose here?